[UPDATED] Smart Meters: We Texans are Pro-Choice

Publication1

UPDATE: (03/23/2012)

Since our original posting the Public Utilities Commission has opened a project case on this issue entitled “PUC Proceeding to evaluate the feasibility of instituting a smart meter opt-out program.” This is the first step in the Commission considering implementing an opt-out program for smart metering technology in Texas.  It is through the work of organizations like our own, comments and complaints from Texas consumers like you and also letters from State Representatives that the Commission is responding to consumer demand.

One of the more powerful letters on the issue addressed to Chairman Nelson of the PUC came from Rep. Dennis Bonnen. (You can read the full text of his letter here.) Rep. Bonnen was the original author of the legislation that addressed smart meter implementation in Texas and he made it very clear that mandatory installation of the meters was never his intent. He states in his letter:

“I urge the commission to correct this oversight by providing a simple, customer-friendly process for opting-out of the advanced metering technology… I ask that any necessary rule changes be adopted expeditiously to effectuate my intent, so that additional legislative action is not required. I stand committed to ensuring that this issue is addressed.”

We applaud Rep. Bonnen for his strong stand on the issue and encourage other state legislators to do the same.

To  help obtain an opt-out provision for smart meters in Texas you can get involved by doing the following:

  • Call your state representative and state senator about this issue and ask them to work to provide an opt out provision. Ask them to sign the letter to the PUC and mail that letter to the address below.
  • Call the PUC at 888-782-8477 to let them know you’d like to see an opt out      provision. Mention that your comments are in regards to Docket#: 40190 and the PUC will make note of the fact that you called and requested an opt-out provision.
  • Send your comments stating you believe there should be an opt out provision and encouraging the PUC to revise their rules to accommodate said provision in a letter to:

PUC Central Records
Attn: Filing Clerk
re: Docket #40190
P O Box 13326
Austin, Tx 78711-3326

The Public Utilities Commission is cataloging all comments and requests regarding this project online. You can track the progress of this issue by viewing digital copies of all comments and requests received by the PUC for Docket#40190 here.

ORIGINAL POST: (02/15/2012)

Over the past few months, we’ve heard varied and great concern about the installation of smart electricity meters across Texas. And, there’s been an uprising across the country as citizens voice numerous objections to the devices.  Concerns range from health and safety to privacy issues. In Texas, it is the Public Utility Commission (PUC) which regulates the electricity industry.  The PUC has written the rule requiring participating electric distributors to implement this new technology across their service area. As the rules currently stand, the PUC has not provided a mechanism that would allow consumers to opt out of smart meter installation on their property. We believe, however, from a review of the legislation from which the PUC rules are derived, that the legislature’s intent was permissive and not mandatory in nature.  We further believe therefore that an opt out measure should be made available to Texas consumers.

We have been working to address this concern administratively. We are leading an effort to have the PUC revise rules which mandate the installation of an advanced (smart) meter electric grid in Texas. We have spent countless hours researching the original legislation, reviewing archived committee hearings’ video, calling legislators and meeting with them in person in Austin to discuss this issue. We have identified several legislators who may be willing to facilitate a rule review with the PUC. Last week, we sent a letter to several members of the state legislature outlining for them our research into original legislative intent and asking them to sign a letter to the PUC requesting that the commission revisit their mandatory rules for compliance and create an opt out provision.

Our goal is to have an opt out measure incorporated into the rules without requiring any change in the current law. If it is determined that a legislative change is necessary, Texans will have to wait until 2013 to seek a solution.

If you would like to help with this effort, you can:

  • Call your state representative and state senator about this issue and ask them to work to provide an opt out provision
  • Print and fax or email a copy of the letter to your legislator.  Ask them to sign the letter to the PUC and forward that signed letter to us at contact@WeTexans.com or via fax to 979-532-5481.
  • Call the PUC at 888-782-8477 to let them know you’d like to see an opt out provision.
Be Heard! Leave your comments below and share this post

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1380284375 Patriot Shar

      PRESS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCED
    Ban ‘smart’ meter fight goes to PUC – Public health at known risk
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    Wednesday, February 22, 2012
    From the Office of Tom Cryer, Attorney at Law
    Media inquiries for Tom Cryer: 318.797.8949

    Media inquiries for Devvy Kidd: devvyk@earthlink.net

    (Austin, TX – February 22, 2012) Thousands of upset and angry citizens have been at war with Texas utility companies over installation of ‘smart’ meters on homes and businesses for the past few years. “Smart” meters are digital meters that monitor electricity use every few minutes and report that data by wireless signal to receivers and towers and, ultimately, to the electric utility. The meters are being pressed by the utilities in anticipation of charging different rates for usage at different times of the day and night, providing the utilities with a premium for peak times and increasing their profits.

    Utilities also claim that the smart meters will permit them to communicate with “smart” appliances, such as air conditioners, dryers and water heaters, turning them off when demands on the system would otherwise require adjustments in electricity distribution on the grid, saving utility companies money.  Many, however, are opposed to the installation of the meters because they are a serious health risk, compromise the consumers’ privacy and provide no savings or conservation purposes.

    The “smart” meters will not save the consumer any money, since he will be subjected to higher time of day based rates and to interruption of his use of appliances.  The meters will not reduce the amount of electricity a customer uses nor will it result in any savings.  Several state legislators have requested a moratorium on further installations until the meters can be tested because so many of their constituents have reported that after installation of the meters their bills suddenly became much bigger although their use of electricity did not change.

    Consumers are opposed to the installation of these “smart” meters for numerous reasons, from potentially deadly radio frequency radiation to outside interference with their use of electricity to privacy.  Those opposed over the issue of privacy are concerned because wireless transmissions can be intercepted by anyone with a receiver.  One hacker recently demonstrated how he could, and did, with a $30 device readily available in the marketplace, intercept data on households at will. Consumers claim their privacy is being violated and their personal electricity consumption is now becoming someone’s paycheck.  Consumers are also concerned that thieves and burglars would have the same access to that data and would be able to determine when no one us usually at home.

    However, by far and away, the biggest issue is the known health risks ignored by the utility companies and TDSPs (Transmission and Distribution Service Provider).  Devvy and John Kidd, residents of Big Spring, went nose to nose with ONCOR in July 2011, when ONCOR attempted to install a ‘smart’ meter on their home. Devvy is an investigative journalist who began researching the health risks and due to her husband’s medical issues decided to fight installation. When ONCOR decided to play hard ball by threatening to terminate power to their home, Mrs. Kidd hired constitutional law attorney, Tom Cryer, to represent her and her husband. Mr. Kidd is a retired U.S. Army Colonel and classified as medically disabled.

    While state law prohibits terminating power to any home where a disabled person resides, that didn’t stop ONCOR from flipping the switch on Mr. & Mrs. Sage who live in Allen, TX. Mrs. Sage has a bad heart and due to their concern about the ‘smart’ meter, switched it out and installed a new analog meter. ONCOR, without notice, turned out the lights on January 31, 2012. The Sage’s still have no power despite making a personal plea to State Rep. Ken Paxton requesting he contact the PUC and ask them to issue an emergency order for ONCOR to restore the Sage’s power until this situation comes before the full commission. Although neither federal nor state laws make the installation of the “smart” meters mandatory, utilities and their contractors routinely tell consumers that they are required by law to accept the radiation emitting devices in their homes and businesses.  While the utilities are misrepresenting the law to consumers, utilities are not disclosing to consumers that the “smart” meters flood their homes and offices with potentially harmful radio frequency (RF) radiation and electromagnetic frequency (EMF) radiation throughout the day and night.

    “After decades of study the scientific community and government health related agencies are warning people to avoid additional exposures to RF and EMF radiation because it has been linked to many ailments including minor issues, such as headaches, nausea, dizziness, to life threatening, such as heart function interference, brain function interference, jamming of pacemakers and insulin injectors, DNA disruption causing birth defects and even cancer,” Kidd said.

    Despite the significant number of petitions sent to the PUC over the years, requests to have the meters removed and rallies in cities like Houston, installation of the meters and bullying by TDSP’s, the situation remains unresolved. Devvy and dozens of petitioners are now taking the fight to the Texas PUC for a formal, public hearing which will include expert witness testimony. Her lawyer, Tom Cryer, of Shreveport, LA, will file a formal petition with PUC on Thursday, February 23, 2012, at the PUC’s offices in Austin, Texas. Kidd and Cryer will submit the filing requesting an immediate moratorium on further installations and a demanding a hearing on whether the meters present an unreasonable risk to public safety, health and welfare, compromise the privacy of consumers and provide no benefit or energy savings and should be banned permanently.  Alternatively, the petition demands rules requiring full disclosure of health and safety risks prior to installation and prohibiting installation without consumers’ consent.

    PRESS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED:  All media are invited to interview Devvy Kidd and Tom Cryer at 2:00 pm in front of the TPUC building at 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas, Thursday, February 23, 2012.
    _______________________________________________________________
    Please send this VIRAL & get it to media & on social sites everywhere … then IF ya can make a show of support … that would be great !!!

  • Mocarter

    We also need a way to get our old meter back.  I have had a smart meter forced on me already.

    • 2012RonPaul

       Me too! And the meter is on the outside of my bedroom wall, literally 6 feet from where I sleep. I want it gone!

    • Tblair417

      Me too…and I’m mad about it!  They did it while I was at work!

  • American903

    I had a “smart meter” that sent my usage info down the electrical line and not through cyberspace and they came and changed it out.  Why?  They can accomplish the same goals by sending the info they want to collect over the transmission line and not through the air!

  • http://www.facebook.com/thelma.taormina Thelma Taormina

    We need a total BAN, opting out does not solve our problem!
     

  • Mathis122000

    Radio waves are harmful. Insane.